Dear Craig, you wrote (1 March 2003): > Correction: Mr Schulze was right in saying that an AV-like method > that passes the test of monotonicity and that is defined explicitly > for all numbers candidates, and that need not be optimal, is not known.
What is an "AV-like method"? What does "explicitly defined" mean in this context? Could you give a concrete example of a method that is well defined but not "explicitly defined"? What does "optimal" mean in this context? Markus Schulze ---- For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
