> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:44 PM > It is possible, with Asset Voting, to approach the Hare quota, and > even to exactly meet it, and, under Asset, presuming a winner with > the Droop quota could result in less than the ideal proportional > representation. It would depend on the specific rules and context. > Certainly the logic behind the Droop quota is good.
Asset Voting is Asset Voting. STV-PR is STV-PR. James Gilmour ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
