Dear Adb ul-Rahman, > I dislike, by the way, describing voters as selfish if they vote in > their own interest. That's the default, they *should* vote in their > own interest.
That is probably a language problem again. I thought "selfish" was a synonym for "acting in my own interest only", is it not? However, the latter was what I meant to say. > What I ended up suggesting was that the problem is resolved if the > voters negotiate. It's possible to set up transfers of value (money?) > such that the utilities are equalized, and that the benefit of > selecting C is thus distributed such that the A voters do *not* lose > by voting for C. If they vote for A, they get A but no compensation. > If they vote for C, they get C plus compensation. If the utilities > were accurate -- Juho claimed that they were *not* utilities, but > that then makes the problem incomprehensible in real terms -- then > overall satisfication is probably optimized by the choice of C with > compensation to the A voters, coming from the C voters. Certainly the > reverse is possible, that is, the A voters could pay the C voters > compensation to elect A, but it would have to be much higher compensation! I understood this. But I consider it quite absurd that the A voters should be "compensated" for anything. This would be only justified if something was taken from them which in a sense belonged to them rightfully. What my arguing is all about is that I don't think the A voters have such a right to the certain election of A, at most one could perhaps say the have a right to A getting at least 55% winning probability. So, if they would prefer to have A with 55% and B with 45% over having C with 100%, only then one could perhaps argue that they should be compensated if C was to be elected with certainty. Yours, Jobst _______________________________________________________________________ Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 3 Monate kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220 ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
