Dan,
--- Dan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Kevin Venzke wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > --- Dan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> >> This method meets the Majority Criterion (like Buckling) and
> >> Monotonicity (unlike Bucklin), but as you can see from the example, it
> >> can elect the last choice of a majority! Perhaps some kind of instant
> >> run-off would help.
> >
> > Are you sure that Bucklin fails monotonicity?
> Now that I'm fully awake: No, I'm not.
> > Are you assuming a certain
> > treatment of equal rankings?
> I would recommend the treatment used by ER-Bucklin (fractional).
I see that this treatment is probably more compatible with your proposed
method.
I have preferred "whole" treatment (the monotonic version that leaves lower
preferences in the same positions when a higher preference is raised) for
standard Bucklin since this satisfies FBC.
Kevin Venzke
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
http://mail.yahoo.fr
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
