Kevin,
I see. Likewise I don't advocate my method suggestion.
We know that if we are prepared to forgo LNHarm and
LNHelp we can get a much better bargain than just
Minimal Defense.
I don't find "ladder voting" hugely interesting or
desirable.
Chris Benham
Thu Jan 10 10:49:59 PST 2008
Chris,
--- Chris Benham <cbenhamau at yahoo.com.au> a écrit :
> So my suggestion swaps the two LNHs for Minimal
> Defense while IVFAR loses the LNHs and Irrelevant
> Ballots for apparently "nothing tangible".
I don't really oppose the version of IVFAR which
satisfies IB.
I don't advocate IVFAR so much as note that it's what
Instant VFAR would look like, and that to my mind it
is a good imitation of "ladder" voting with
candidates.
Kevin Venzke
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now.
www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
