One could use also the coordinates of the homes of the voters and get
rid of some of the polling station location related speculation. (One
would be pretty much forced to use the computerized (personal)
candidate lists that I mentioned in my other mail.)
Juho
On Aug 26, 2008, at 10:22 , Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Juho wrote:
On Aug 26, 2008, at 1:20 , Raph Frank wrote:
Each candidate can register in any number of polling stations
covering
at most N seat's worth of population. (N=5 might be reasonable).
You might want to keep the sizes of the registered areas of each
candidate about equal (or to balance the situation in some other
way).
Well, since we're already talking about logistics-heavy methods,
how about this: Take the location of the candidate (his home). Then
order the polling stations by distance from that location. Find the
number p at which the circle given by the radius drawn from the
candidate's home to polling station #p on the sorted list (closer
first) encompasses more than N seats worth of population. Then the
candidate is listed on the ballot in polling stations 1 to (p-1) on
the sorted list, inclusive.
If the politicians have any influence in where the polling stations
are placed, they would want to put them more or less evenly so that
if, for instance, all polling stations are to the North of a
candidate, one would add some to the South too, to get on more
ballots.
Strategic house buying would be funny! Perhaps parties would have
"candidate houses", all of which are carefully located so as to
maximize the effect, and new candidates are given one of them to
stay in for as long as he's a candidate.
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for
list info
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
