Kathy,
if you please could stop propagating false statement, your credibility index
could
grow back again...
I'll give you a real sentence: no government has any need to centralize the
count of millions of preferential ballot using IRV, it only needs to
coordinate the job.
From: "Kathy Dopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jonathan Lundell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:49:21 -0700
Jonathan,
You got anything to say other than gibberish?
How about a real sentence or two on how exactly you want the US
government to count over 100 million IRV votes for president?
Kathy
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Jonathan Lundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> I.e. IRV would necessitate that the federal government be responsible
>>>> for counting all the nation's ballots if IRV were used to elect the
>>>> President - so we can expect all IRV/STV proponents to oppose
national
>>>> popular vote for president.
>>>
>>> You can expect it all you like, but you'd be wrong.
>>>
>>
>> Really? So you support having the federal government count all the
>> ballots for all US citizens? Exactly who and how do you imagine that
>> could be done?
>
> Think of it as a ranked choice: IRV > NPV > EC.
>
> That wasn't so hard, was it?
>
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
