http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/113492794/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Preferential voting and the rule of the majority
Melvin P. Porter
The progress of the Bucklin system to date (June 1, 1914) can be
seen from the following list of preferential voting cities on page 582.
In the January issue of the National Municipal Review Professor
Lewis J. Johnson enumerates the following cities as now using
preferential voting: Grand Junction, Colorado; Spokane, Washington;
Pueblo, Colorado; New Iberia, Louisiana; Duluth, Minnesota; Denver,
Colorado; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Portland, Oregon; Kashua, New
Hampshire; Cleveland, Ohio; Fort Collins, Colorado; La Grande,
Oregon. The following cities are to be added to the list: Cadillac,
Michigan; St. Petersburg, Florida; Lethbridge, Alberta. By virtue of
the act of assembly passed by the New Jersey legislature on April 7,
all commission-governed citiea in New Jersey that have already
adopted that form and that may adopt that form in the future will
come under the preferential system. Therefore the follqwing named
New Jersey cities are to be added to the list: Atlantic City,
Beverly, Bordentown, Deal Beach, Haddonlield, Hawthorne, Jersey
City, Long Branch, Longport, Margate City, Millville, Nutley, Ocean
City, Orange, Paasaic, Phillipsburg, Ridgewood, Ridgefield Park, Sea
Isle City, Trenton, Union, Vineland, Wallington, Wildwood.
This is far more success than IRV has so far enjoyed in the U.S. It
was all gone not long after. Why?
http://books.google.com/books?id=r2NmcitFyBMC&pg=PA129&lpg=PA129&dq=Pueblo+preferential+voting&source=bl&ots=5BVnulkdjd&sig=LTzhj3BBmL7UlacdNW_2BeU_lKY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPP1,M1
This is a googlebook, Direct Elections and Law-making by Popular
Vote, with lots of details about early preferential adoptions in the
U.S. The first one was apparently Grand Junction, i.e., Bucklin. But
the book covers proportional representation, single transferable
vote, and the Grand Junction system, and notes that the Grand
Junction system included a candidate elimination with each round,
specifically to ensure that a winner had a "respectable number of
first preference votes." The book calls Bucklin "The American
system" and single transferable vote "The English system." The
difference, of course, is that the "American system" adds in the
additional preference votes, whereas the "English system" transfers
them from eliminated candidates. None of the actual Bucklin elections
that I've examined eliminated candiates; it seems to have been
realized that this wasn't necessary.
Spokane implemented Bucklin for a five-winner election in 1911. There
were *92* names on the ballot the first time it was used. (This was a
vote-for-five at 1st and 2nd preference, vote for as many as you like
in the Other category.) I don't have details, but there is a report
in the book that the election went off without a hitch.
http://books.google.com/books?id=YwgKAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=Pueblo+preferential+voting&source=web&ots=u0n1UQw9HC&sig=MDdPL97IFZMGgv49hHVe6iHnyUU&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result
1916: It appears that San Francisco adopted Preferential Voting.
Bucklin system. Gad, does anybody read history? There is a list of 52
cities using Bucklin in the cited article, as of December 1, 1916.
The article made this claim, apparently accurate as of that date:
No city once having adopted the Bucklin system has ever voluntarily
given it up. Duluth was forced to give it up by a divided decision
of the state supreme court declaring it to be in violation of the
Minnesota constitution.
The first adoption of Bucklin was in Grand Junction in 1909, though.
That's certainly not a long history!
Cities over 100,000 population (1910) that adopted Bucklin, per this
article: Spokane WA, Denver CO, Portland OR, Cleveland OH, Columbus
OH, Jersey City NJ, Paterson NJ, San Francisco CA, Toledo OH.
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
