I'm not sure at all what context this is, but it's fairly simple to define a "closest winner" metric that is completely transparent.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raph Frank Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 4:00 PM To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm Cc: Election Methods Mailing List Subject: Re: [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <[email protected]> wrote: > Using a closest winner metric has a kind of obscuration/concealment effect, > though. I see what you are saying. There would need to be some way to match voters to candidates so each candidate has a quota of voters. (ofc then there is the Hare/Droop quota issue) ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
