I dumped the data through my implementations and got pretty similar
results which can be seen here:
http://bolson.org/voting/burlington_vt/
My implementations proceed with different rules which generally allow
any ranking or ratings to be cast and counted, so will have different
totals than the official count.
On Jan 5, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Schulze returns C03 > C04 > C02 > C01 > C05 > C06. So does minmax,
Borda, Vote For and Against (1, 0, 0..., -1), and Nauru Borda.
Plurality returns C03 > C04 > C02 > C01 > C06 > C05. So does Hare
(IRV) and Carey.
Antiplurality returns C03 > C02 = C01 > C04 > C05 > C06.
All positional methods are whole.
The Condorcet matrix is
0 1289 804 1161 2028 3290
5165 0 3397 3556 5136 5875
6961 5730 0 4763 7027 7351
6747 5545 3991 0 6790 7336
1869 1318 603 987 0 3094
431 311 194 323 510 0
(row beats column), and the WV basis is thus:
0 0 0 0 2028 3290
5165 0 0 0 5136 5875
6961 5730 0 4763 7027 7351
6747 5545 0 0 6790 7336
0 0 0 0 0 3094
0 0 0 0 0 0
which means that C03 is the CW.
(If my program has bugs, there will be errors in the above.)
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
