On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <[email protected]> wrote: > The "construct the assembly and then let it vote" approach might be > reducible to ordinary Bayesian Regret. The idea would be this: single-winner > BR assigns utilities to all candidates and voters. Call the candidates' > utilities their "defined utilities".
You would need one for each dimension that is being tested. However, a assembly made up of clones would also vote the same way as the people, if they were purely centrist. This is kinda the same point I made in my post. Would a voter prefer an assembly with higher average utility of the candidates, or one where he has 1 candidate who is an exact clone of him. ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
