Good Morning, Michael re: "Sorry, I expanded the context."
As we used to say, years ago, 'sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof'. When responding to my comments about political parties, why 'expand the context'? In a discussion of a complex topic, focus is imperative. Why go beyond the issues I raised. If you can refute my assertions about political parties, please do so. If not, agree they are correct, and we can proceed from that point.
In addition to altering the context of the discussion, you couched your response in a different, and, to me, unintelligible, language. If we are to discuss a complex topic, it is important that we do so in a common language. I wrote my description in English. That's the only language I consider myself capable of using for communication. If you can explain why my comments about political parties are incorrect, and would care to do so in English, I will respond as well as I can.
re: "To state the obvious is not fallacious ..." Ya got me! Fred Gohlke ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
