FYI, It seems that "Fair" Vote and Minneapolis are taking the approach that repeating the same lie often enough makes it true (or fools people into thinking it is true).
http://www.electionmathematics.org/em-IRV/DefendantsDocs/DefendentsSupremeCourtBrief.pdf They're back to claiming that IRV solves the "wasted vote (spoiler)" problem, that it finds majority winners, that it saves money, that plurality elections are nonmonotonic, and numerous other knowingly false claims, etc. Cheers, Kathy ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
