Good Afternoon, Michael

re: "Should these people be allowed to shift their votes?  You
     asked specifically about the possibility of *guiding* those
     who are already elected."

I don't want to waffle, but I can't give you a categorical response to your question because it presumes an infrastructure different from the one I had in mind. The circumstances you describe are, essentially, an implementation of direct democracy. That does not make it bad. In fact, it might be quite good, but I think it goes beyond representative democracy and the heart of my proposal is to harness human nature to the task of improving the quality of the people who represent us in our government.

When I spoke of 'guiding' our representatives, I was thinking in terms of a means by which an elected official's constituents could communicate their opinions and attitudes. More, I suppose, like letters to the editor than voting. It's true that I also envisioned the possibility of referendum and recall ... which would certainly involve voting ... but I don't favor carrying that capability to every nitty-gritty detail of government.

If one's goal is direct democracy, your suggestion is exemplary (although I think it might be cumbersome in practice and would effectively restrict participation to those who express themselves well in writing).


re: "You were concerned about manipulation.  Do you still think
     the process can be manipulated?  In the context of these
     scenarios, what form would the manipulation take?"

In the context of the scenarios you described, I'm hesitant to offer an opinion. Even though I can imagine such silliness as an adjacent homeowner inveighing against the proposal because she doesn't want sand blowing onto her dinner table, I really don't think manipulation would be a serious problem in the scenarios you described. However, when we are talking about elevating candidates for public office by the Practical Democracy method, when the higher levels are reached, the likelihood that vested interests would conduct campaigns to get voters to switch their votes is immense.

Were these two comments responsive to your questions? I've had a major influx of family members over the past few days, here to help celebrate my impending 80th birthday, and I fear my focus is not all it could be.

On another topic, I've been a member of World-Wide-Democracy.net (WDDM) for a few years, but have not been active for about two years. It occurs to me that your work might be of great interest to the people at that site. You can find them at:

http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/WddmWikiMain

Fred Gohlke
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to