Jonathan Lundell  > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:18 AM
> In fact, a special provision must be made to ensure that previously  
> elected candidates remain elected in a countback. There are at least a  
> couple of ways to accomplish this. It ends up being a subtle problem.  

Jonathan, that's a helpful clarification.  Does OpenSTV include such "special 
provisions", so that it can cope with "count-back"
counts as well as counts where there are "withdrawn" candidates?


> (It's also worth noting that additional candidates might choose not to  
> stand, or be ineligible to stand, in the countback, and would need to  
> be marked as withdrawn as well.)

Yes, that would be the expected approach for STV count-back, as it is in 
party-list PR systems where the casual vacancy is filled by
the "next" candidate of the relevant party.

James

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.100/2375 - Release Date: 09/16/09 
05:51:00


----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to