Hallo, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote (21 March 2010):
> Schulze's advantage is that it's actually being > used and that it provides good results (by the > Minmax standard). Ranked Pairs's (or MAM's, > rather) is that it's easy to explain. > > The question is: which of these qualities are > more important, were we to encourage the use of a > Condorcet method in real (governmental) elections? I claim that Burlington repealed IRV mainly because it chose a candidate with a strong worst defeat. Markus Schulze ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
