Here is some discussion on full and approximate compatibility with election method related criteria. My aim is to prove that sometimes it is better to fail to meet some criteria (that are good in the sense that one wants to meet them) than to meet them.

First a story from real life. A mother of three children buys three cakes for the kids on her way home. She puts the cakes on the dinner table for the kids to eat. But then their dog steals and eats one of the cakes. All the kids try to grab one of the cakes and make sure that at lest they will get their share. The mother interrupts the kids and decides to cut the cakes in parts so that each kid gets 2/3 of a cake. The wrong solution would have been to meet the requirements of two of the kids. The best solution was not to meet the requirements of any of the kids.

Let's say that there are three different criteria that an election method should meet. They are related to three different strategic voting related problems. As in the world of security also election methods are as vulnerable to strategic voting as their weakest link. In this situation there may be a solution that almost meets all the three criteria but does not meet any of them fully. That solution is often (but not always) the best solution.

So, there are patterns where a good method should meet only a strict subset of the requirements that some competing methods meet. One may thus improve a method by making it incompatible to some (good) criterion that it earlier met. The point is that compatibility with various criteria should often not be an on/off comparison but a richer analysis where also partial and almost complete compatibilities are counted.

Juho



P.S. Note that there are also criteria that one should meet in most situations but that in some special situations should not be met. A good method may sometimes fail these criteria, but not to give up something in order to give space to meeting better / more accurately some other criteria as discussed above but to directly improve the method.






----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to