Hi Abd,
--- En date de : Mer 26.5.10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> a
écrit :
> Later-No-Harm is an offensive criterion. It's really a
> voting strategy, and reasonable *if* the voter has strong
> preference, and not if the voter doesn't.
I didn't really understand this. If LNHarm is a voting strategy, then
surely the strategy is "to rank all the candidates." If so, then why
is it reasonable if the voter has strong preferences but not if he
doesn't?
Kevin Venzke
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
