Jameson Quinn wrote (18 Oct 2010):

I edited Electowiki to essentially replace the Bucklin-ER article with a
new, expanded MCA article. In this article, I define 6 MCA variants. I find
that as a class, they do surprisingly well on criteria compliance. Please
check my work:

http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Majority_Choice_Approval#Criteria_compliance

    Criteria compliances

All MCA variants satisfy the Plurality criterion <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Plurality_criterion>, the Majority criterion for solid coalitions <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Majority_criterion_for_solid_coalitions>, Monotonicity <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Monotonicity_criterion> (for MCA-AR, assuming first- and second- round votes are consistent), and Minimal Defense <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Minimal_Defense_criterion> (which implies satisfaction of the Strong Defensive Strategy criterion <http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Strong_Defensive_Strategy_criterion>).


It is well known that in general run-off methods fail mono-raise (aka Monotonicity), and these methods
are no exception.

22: A
23: A>C
24: B
27: C>B
02: D>C
06: E
(104 ballots)

TR scores:           A45,   B24,   C27,   D2,   E6.
Approval scores: A45,   B51,   C52,   D2,   E6.

I am assuming that 3-slot ballots are used, and since no candidate has either a Top Ratings or Approval score that reaches the majority threshold the runoff will be between the TR winner A and the Approval winner C. A wins that runoff 45-29, but if the 2 D>C ballots change to D>A the Approval winner changes to B and
now A loses that runoff 47-49.

22: A
23: A>C
24: B
27: C>B
02: D>A  (was D>C)
06: E
(104 ballots)

TR scores:           A45,   B24,   C27,   D2,   E6.
Approval scores: A47,   B51,   C50,   D2,   E6.

Also I would quibble that methods that use ballots that don't allow voters to express a full ranking of the candidates really properly meet Majority for Soild Coalitions, but instead just meet a restricted form of
it (which is nonetheless very valuable).

And I'm surprised that a MCA advocate doesn't mention the Favourite Betrayal criterion. Of course the
suggested runoff  "variants of MCA" also fail that.

Chris Benham

----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to