"Mutual" means the same voters constitute the majority for A over B,
as for A over C (and for every other pair; they all have a common majority-size
set of voters behind them).

I am not saying mutual majorities should be especially valued in
comparison with
ordinary majorities.  In fact, if anything I think the opposite is more true.

However, some people claim to care about them, and so I just wanted to
mention a few theorems I thought up while under the influence of drugs
and/or James Green-Armytage.




-- 
Warren D. Smith
http://RangeVoting.org  <-- add your endorsement (by clicking
"endorse" as 1st step)
and
math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to