Hallo, Robert Bristow-Johnson wrote (1 March 2011):
> that said, i can't figure out from the website > who wins according to the Schulze algorithm. I wrote (1 March 2011): > magalski beats baum 48:39. > baum beats mayer 48:46. > mayer beats magalski 48:47. > > The bylaws say that the strength of a pairwise defeat > is measured by the absolute number of votes for the > winner of this pairwise defeat. So each defeat has > a strength of 48. Therefore, there is a tie between > magalski, baum, and mayer. There was a runoff (for the first to the third place of the party list) on 19 March 2011. This runoff was held using approval voting. magalski: 42 votes baum: 42 votes mayer: 27 votes As there was a tie between magalski and baum, the winner (baum) was chosen by lot. Markus Schulze ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
