> > > I think voters could be confused over that where one truncates actually > matters to the method. That is, the method isn't resolvable if everybody > votes untruncated and there's a cycle; no single ballot can break the tie > unless it also breaks the cycle. Further, if only some people truncate, that > would give power to them. > > I understand that there's a strategically-important difference, for an honest A>B>C voter, between A>B and A. However, I think that it's entirely natural for such a voter to truncate C at least. Even if there's an unelectable D=Cthulu, most people's first instinct would be to truncate C=Sheriff of Nottingham.
JQ
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
