Thank you for your comments, Warren. I've modified the page a bit and put in some subheadings.
You'll notice at the bottom of the page that I've mentioned that my version of Proportional Range Voting is not equivalent to normal Range Voting where there is a single winner. It's not simply a case of adding up the scores. I imagine it might be a pain from a programming point of view, but I'd be interested to see how it came out in your Bayesian Regret tables. ________________________________ From: Warren Smith <[email protected]> To: election-methods <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, 3 July, 2011 20:25:35 Subject: [EM] Toby Pereira, PR voting methods Two are RRV http://rangevoting.org/RRV.html and asset voting http://rangevoting.org/Asset.html A recent real-world election that used RRV is described here: June2011RealWorldRRVvotes.txt In T.P.'s essay it'd be nice if he subdivided it into smaller chunks with subheading titles, and summarized whatever he concluded concisely. -- Warren D. Smith http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking "endorse" as 1st step) and math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
