Last night I realized that my example below shows that my variant of DSC fails
later-no-harm.
> Here's an example that illustrates the difference in Woodall's
> DSC and my modified version:
>
> 25 A1>A2
> 35 A2>A1
> 20 B>A1
> 20 C>A1
In my modification of
DSC A1 wins. If the A2 faction truncates A1, then the solid coalition with the
greatest support is just
{A2}, so A2, wins. This means that "later" does indeed harm A2. Therefore,
like DAC, my modification
of DSC fails later-no-harm.
Does my modification of DAC fail later-no-help?
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
