2011/10/2 Richard Fobes <[email protected]> > The actual document contains links to the Wikipedia articles (along with > lots of nice formatting, etc.). This version is text-only. > > Perhaps we should post the actual formatted (with-links) declaration on the > electorama wiki? This would require protecting the document from being > modified. And perhaps we can create a separate (unlocked) page on which > election-reform advocates can add their signatures, then periodically > someone can transfer new signatures to the locked declaration page. We also > need to post a PDF version somewhere online. The current Google Docs > version cannot be viewed without logging into a Google account. Suggestions > ...? > > I hope to have time to improve the "Condorcet method" Wikipedia article, > yet any assistance is welcome. Whoever posted the complaint about a lack of > references doesn't seem to have followed the links that go to the full > separate version-specific articles. Someone else on this list besides known > Condorcet advocates (particularly Markus Schulze and myself) may be able to > remove that message (or at least move it to the section that contains IRV > comparison claims) after commenting in the discussion page that academic > references are provided in the version-specific articles. >
Actually, I believe that Wikipedia protocol is to duplicate references, so that each page stands on its own. JQ
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
