On Oct 9, 2011, at 5:04 PM, matt welland wrote: > So now I'm going to have to stare at a ballot with 20 items and 20! > possible arrangements (is it really that many? its been a long time > since stats class). All I can say is that it sucks and I'd prefer to > stick with broken plurality rather than deal with this. Oh well.
Easy to deal with that: rank your plurality choice #1 and go home. (It's more than 20!, but of course the number of permutations is irrelevant to real-world voting.) ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
