Thanks again for the legal/historical analysis. Clearly, I'm out of my league. In fact:
This is a pretty solid argument that FMV will not pass until the 1967 law is >> overturned. >> > > If the 1967 law were repealed (it is unlikely to be overturned - since > Congress has the authority of dictating the manner of electing > representatives), > Apparently I was even confused about the difference between repealed, overturned, and supplanted (though I get it now). I meant to say, any of the three. Thanks, JQ
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
