> Following up on last-month's poll for favorite single-winner voting > system, I am now doing a poll for favorite multi-winner voting system.
> http://opavote.org/vote?ekey=agNzdHZyEAsSCEVsZWN0aW9uGJTHHww ¿Why do not you have the best multiwinner proportional system Asset-Voting invented by Lewis Carroll? If you insist on STV-like systems, RRV (Reweighted Range-Voting uses STV, but takes into account how-much people love the candidates. You should not list Approval. Approval Voting is single-winner. A single-winner system used for multiwinner can cause a party with plurality to get all seats: This is what happened at the WikiMediaFoundation. They heard good things about Schulze-Condorcet and used it for multiwinner. Now a plurality-faction controls the whole legislature of the WikiMediaFundation. Speaking about singe/multi-winner, I hope that you count your votes using a voting system for single-winner like Condocet. If you count the votes using a system for multiwinner like STV, the results will be garbage because of nonmonotonicity. In the future, for single-winner polls, I suggest Score-Voting with a range of 00-99, or if your software can correctly handle negative votes, -99 to +99 so that people can express how-much they hate certain options. For future multiwinner polls, I suggest RRV (Rewweighted Range-Voting). ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
