Mike Ossipoff has been understandably concerned about what he calls the "Approval
Bad Example" (ABE), as exemplified by

49: C     (sincere)
27: A>B (sincere)
24: B     (sincere is B>C, but are trying to steal election from A).

He considers that a voting method must meet the Favorite Betrayal Criterion (FBC) and also he objects to the B voters in the above scenario being rewarded for their "defection" from the sincere {A,B} coalition (as they are with any method that meets both the Plurality
and Minimal Defense criteria).

I suggest this method to fill the bill. It uses Kevin Venzke's special "Tied-at-the-Top"
pairwise rule.

http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/index.php?title=Tied_at_the_top

*Voters submit 3-slot ratings ballots, default rating is Bottom signifying least preferred,
Top rating signifies most preferred, the other ratings slot is Middle.

According to the "Tied-at-the-Top" pairwise rule (TTP), candidate X beats candidate Y if the number of ballots on which X is given a higher rating than Y *plus the number of ballots on which X and Y are both rated Top* is greater than the number of ballots on
which Y is given a higher rating than X.

(And of course vice versa, so it is possible for any pair of candidates X and Y that some
ballots show Top rating for both to TTP beat each other).

If any candidate X TTP beats any candidate Y, is not in turn TTP beaten by Y and is not TTP beaten by any candidate Z that doesn't also TTP beat Y, then Y is disqualified.

Elect the undisqualified candidate that is rated Top on the highest number of ballots.*

I think and hope this meets the FBC. If it can be shown not to then I will withdraw my
support for it.  It meets the Mono-add-Plump and the Plurality criteria.

In the above example election no candidate is disqualified and C wins. If the B supporters
vote sincerely then C will be disqualified and A will win.

My suggested name for this method "Tied at Top Pairwise Disqualification, Top Ratings" (TTPD,TR) is currently tentative and unenthusiastic, so if it is agreed that it meets the FBC
then I'm open to other suggestions.

Chris Benham





----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to