2011/12/7 MIKE OSSIPOFF <[email protected]>

>
> Chris:
>
> You wrote:
>
> I think this fails the FBC.
>
> [endquote]
>
> But you're specifically referring to what I now call "MMT1", which
> isn't my main MMT proposal now. Sorry that I've kept changing my
> MMT definitions--I know that's a nuisance--but now it's a matter of
> whether MMT2 meets FBC and Mono-Add-Plump.
>
> Of course, if MMT2 turned out to fail FBC, then of course I
> wouldn't propose it.
>
> And if it turned out to fail Mono-Add-Plump, that would eliminate
> its main advantage over MDDTR.
>

But it does fail Mono-Add-Plump, using the same example Chris gave.

Jameson

>
> Mike Ossipoff
>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to