On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 07:14 AM, Clinton Mead wrote: > >> Why not simply IRV until 500 candidates are left. >> > > STV would probably be better - or if you want a weighted assembly, > continuous cumulative voting (which is like RV except every ballot's rating > is divided by the sum of the undivided ratings on that ballot). > > Why STV? The original poster wanted elected representatives to have votes proportional to their electoral support yes? There's no need for fractional transfers from elected candidates then.
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
