2012/2/7 MIKE OSSIPOFF <[email protected]> > Kristofer: > > You say that MJ and RV are the methods to propose because they're the ones > that meet the two criteria you defined. > > Have you demonstrated that they're the only ones? > > What about Approval? It's simpler. Simpler to define, implement and vote. > And supplementable by the conditionality options that I've > described, to get rid of the co-operation/defection problem. > > Your reply regarding MJ seemed basically to be saying that maybe you won't > regret voting sincerely in MJ. That's great if you like "maybe". > > When you say that some will rate sincerely, you're moving the topic to > psychology. And I like the way you guys like to theorize about how people > would vote, while declining to find out what voting is like in the various > proposed methods, via a poll. >
I am engaged in exactly this research through mturk. I will let the list know when I have worthwhile results. > > But maybe you're right. Maybe in MJ some would rate sincerely and some > would, instead, voting in their best interest. > > Whether that is good or bad depends on whether the suckers are your > co-factionalists or mine. > In the chicken dilemma, "suckers" tend to be good for the society as a whole. Jameson > > > Mike Ossipoff > > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info > >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
