¡Hello!

        ¿How fare you?

        We require candidates to get the squareroot of the number of voters to 
get on the ballot with writeins allowed.  Let us look at an hypothetical 
single-winnerelection:

        Let us suppose that 420 people make the ballot.  ¿How can the voters 
vet this many candidates?  Well now, we have a score of parties and a score of 
independents.  That is a score of candidates per party and a score of 
independents.  We have score-voting primaries.  The voters only have to inform 
themselves about a score of candidates:

        We have scorevoting primaries with a range of -99 to +99 with writeins 
allowed.  All candidates with positive scores go to a scorevoting runoff.  Then 
the top 2 from scorevoting runoff goto a top-2 runoff.  For our purposes, 
independents are a party and have primaries.

        We just reduced the number of candidates from 420 to 21, 1 from each 
party and 1 independent.  Then we go to the general election:

        We have a scorevoting general election.  All candidates with positive 
sums go to a scorevoting runoff.  Then the top 2 go to a top-2 runoff.  Using 
primaries and runoffs, we successfully vetted 420 candidates.  It only took 6 
elections.  If we have 1 election every 2 months, we can do it all in 1 year.

        ¡Peace!

-- 

        “⸘Ŭalabio‽” <[email protected]>

Skype:
        Walabio

An IntactWiki:
        http://intactipedia.org/

        “You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your 
own facts.”
        ——
        Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to