> >>> I also note that of course the differences in regional disproportionality >>> due to the sizes of multi-member districts are much smaller than regional >>> >disproportionality caused by single-member districts. >> >> Not a valid comparison. Single member districts aren't intended or >> meant to be proportional. > > I meant regional proportionality (not political proportionality), i.e. making > the number of representatives per population equal in each area. >
In that case, then single member districts, drawn with equal population, can have perfectly equal regional proportionality, as exactly equal as desired. So your statement quoted at the top of this post is incorrect. Equal district representation per person. Mike Ossipoff ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
