Is this essentially equivalent to the normal statement of FBC? Or is it meaningfully stronger in some way? (Obviously, it's "weaker" because it doesn't talk about the situation where the only way to make A win is to vote nobody at the top at all; but that's a silly case that will never matter for a real voting system.)
Jameson 2012/7/28 Michael Ossipoff <[email protected]> > FBC7: > > Moving a candidate to top on your ballot shouldn't give the/a win to > someone not at top on your ballot. > > (A candidate is at top on your ballot if you don't vote anyone over hir) > > [end of FBC7 definition > > That FBC definition is so obvious that it has probably been suggested > before. > > Approval and ICT meet FBC7. Ordinary (un-improved) Condorcet fails > FBC7 (and every FBC). > > Mike Ossipoff > > > > ] > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
