On 11.11.2012, at 18.16, Chris Benham wrote: > [robert bristow-johnson wrote:] "the most realistic path to accomplishing > that is *not* to advocate a method > that cannot be explained to citizen-legislators." > > Yes, but it also helps to advocate a method that opponents can't easily > ridicule > with bad examples.
Which methods don't have any such "bad examples" that can be used for negative marketing? ;-) Juho
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
