On 01/18/2013 05:18 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote:
2013/1/18 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On 01/17/2013 06:07 PM, Richard Fobes wrote: Soon enough, just as has happened in Aspen (CO) and Burlington (VT), the weaknesses of IRV counting will get exposed. In the meantime, just getting people to talk about, and think about, the possibility of better ballots and better counting methods is a wonderful development. I just hope that won't lead to a false confusion of IRV with ranked balloting itself and thus thoughts that ranked balloting can't work because IRV blows up spectacularly in an n-way race with n > 2. I'd say it works until n>=2.5, but yes, you're right in general.
Yeah, I was thinking of n integer. ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
