On 4.2.2013, at 15.40, Peter Zbornik wrote:

> Being a green party member (although a Czech one and not US), I would
> advocate only the top-two-run-off
> variant of IRV, i.e. elimination of the candidates and transfer of
> votes until two remain, no quota for election (or quota=100%) except
> for the case where one candidate has more than 50% of first
> preferences.
> 
> The top two candidates would meet in a second round in IRV.
> A candidate would be elected if he/she would get more than 50% of the votes.
> 
> Empty votes would count as  valid votes in both first and second round.
> 
> If no candidate would be elected in second round new elections would take 
> place.
> 
> The advantages of the proposed election system are
> 1) the voters are given a chance to concentrate only on two candidates
> in the second round, and are thus allowed to change their preferences.
> 2) blank votes together with IRV might make the candidates less
> polarized, as, given a large number of blank votes, the candidate with
> the highest number of votes in the second round would have to rely on
> the second preferences of the voters for the opposing candidate in
> order to get 50%+ votes.
> 
> PZ

If one wants to guarentee sufficient support of the winner (50% in the 
description above), then one nice approach is to have an explicit approval 
cutoff in the ballots. By comparing each candidate to that cutoff one can count 
how wide support each candidate has. You can use that information also to 
determine if someone should win already based on the first round, or which 
candidates shoud go to the later rounds.

For example, if the winner of the first round (maybe using a Condorcet method) 
has >50% approval, elect him. Otherwise arrange a second round with the same 
rules, except that you may drop some of the candidates out (maybe all but two).

My point is just that this aproach is formally nice and it collects useful 
additional information that can be used in many ways, like making the decision 
already after the first round.

Juho




----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to