On 17.6.2013, at 18.26, Benjamin Grant wrote:

> Majority Criterion

My definition of Majority Criterion is simply something like "if more than 50% 
of the voters prefer candidate A to all other candidates, then A shall win". 
There are methods that aim at respecting the wishes of the majority ("majority 
oriented"). Range/Score is not one of them. It rather aims at electing the 
candidate that has the highest sum of utility among the voters. This is a 
different need than the idea of letting the majority decide.

Majority oriented methods can give poor results from the range point of view. 
For example sincere votes 51: A=10, B=9, C=9 ; 26: B=10, C=9, A=0 ; 25 C=10, 
B=9, A=0 tell us that B and C have clearly higher average utility among the 
voters than A, although majority of the voters consider A to be the best 
candidate. A would not be a good winner according to the Range philosophy.

One could say that majority oriented methods are typically used in competitive 
environments since majority rule seems to make sense in environments where we 
expect voters to take position strictly in favour of their "own" candidate and 
against the other candidates and vote accordingly. In Range such thinking may 
lead to exaggeration. Maybe we will get votes like 51: A=10, B=0, C=0 ; 26: 
B=10, C=0, A=0 ; 25 C=10, B=0, A=0 although the sincere preferences are as 
above, With this kind of maximally exaggerated votes Range will also respect 
the majority rule (but it loses its expressiveness and its ability to elect the 
candidate that has highest sum of utility among the voters).

In summary, Range is not a majority oriented method, and not really a method 
for competitive environments (since it may become just "approval with 
fractional votes"). It should not follow the majority rule since that would 
ruin its intended other good properties. Majority oriented methods are often 
good for competitive environments. Range is good when the election organizer 
and the voters sincerely want to elect the candidate with highest sum of 
utility.

Juho


----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to