On 26.6.2013, at 13.31, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote: > On 06/26/2013 11:24 AM, Juho Laatu wrote: >> >> On 25.6.2013, at 18.07, Benjamin Grant wrote: > >>> Now there are some criteria that aren't important to me at all, that I >>> do not value what the try to protect - and those I factor out. > >> I think I don't have any criteria that I'd absolutely require. > > How about unanimity? :-)
Ok, that comes close. However, an otherwise excellent method with 1/1000000 random probability of not meeting unaminity, giving victory to some almost equally good candidate, would maybe be a stupid method, but still maybe acceptable. I.e. I could accept it if other alternatives are worse. :-) Juho ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
