Am 10.01.2012 20:38, schrieb Cassidy James:
>
>           * *Better contractor integration*: we have a stub of methods
>             for that, but we may need some widgets, some docs, etc...
>
For what I want, widgets can always be added. So I wouldn't rush in
half-baked code. They could start to be written just after release.
>
>           * *PopOvers debugging*: I think there is not a lot of bugs
>             for the popovers, excepted the bug of double PopOvers (if
>             you try to put a popover in a popover, it behaves oddly).
>             API checks are needed here too. And non-compositing
>             detection (to fallback to a basic dialog).
>
Is nested popover expected to be a valid use case or do you mean it
should issue a warning?
>
>           * I*ntroduce a Granite.Init function?* It might be needed in
>             the future, so, having it now may be better. It could be
>             used to detect the compositing for instance, or whatever.
>
If you ask me, do implicit initialization. That's what WebKit does.
That's what GIO does (remember the threading API thread). And
Gtk.Application though not a mere function, implicitly initializes GTK+.
>
>           * *License changes*: do we want to switch to a LGPL base?
>
That point feels like a déjà-vu, though I may be confusing something. I
have a vague memory of this being the decided plan already.
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to