I think I just understood what you've all been saying. Sorry about this.
So, if I make my class persistent, it's persistent... period! I don't need to add it to a collection or to the root. I guess that's also what Ian was saying about using class indices as well.
That's correct.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Nov 13, 2006, at 10:22 AM, Robert L. Read wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 09:47 -0500, Daniel Salama wrote:
So, would you say that we based on our approach, we could just store
a bunch of random objects (whether person, state, zip, order, etc) in
the root and use class indices? Sounds interesting.
I have to go to the dentist now, but this sounds a bit confused ---- you would EITHER put
things in the root or use persistent classes; doing both doesn't make sense to me.
_______________________________________________
elephant-devel site list
elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
_______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
_______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
