Joubert Nel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reading the Oracle licensing page ... > 3) They specifically state that you don't need a license if your > application is not distributed to others. > > Legally, the clarification then needs to be around what constitutes > "distribution".
Exactly. That is the document I read and it does seem to hinge on the definition of "distribution". > My (limited) legal knowledge would say that a public-facing website does > not constitute distribution of the application. The previously mention 2001 article by the then CEO of Sleepycat seems to agree with that interpretation. Cheers, Chris Dean _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
