On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:36 +0200, Ryszard Szopa wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Ian Eslick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had just run into this myself too! Anyway, I made some tweaks to the > > patch and just pushed the fix. > > > > You could write a whitebox test for the auxiliary function I created called > > elephant-db-path which returns a pathname to probe-file regardless of the > > input spec. > > Here it is. There's one problem though: for POSIX-like systems, > multiple subsequent slashes don't change the meaning of a pathname. > This is not the case for CL pathnames. Should we care about it? > > BTW there are some aspects of the tests system I fail to understand. > For example, elephant-tests fails to compile > (tests/testconcurrency.lisp wants to use package BT, which cannot be > found).
I applied this extra test to the elephant-unstable branch. > > -- Richard > > _______________________________________________ > elephant-devel site list > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
