> We don't declare secondary indicies on dup-btrees, > in case that wasn't clear...
if we did, semantics would be pretty strange, i think.. but what's not clear (perhaps i was not attentive) is if dup-btree in bdb supports duplicated <key, value> pairs, or only duplicated keys with different values. if it supports duplicated pairs, it's worth documenting that db- postmodern does not. _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
