On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Alex Mizrahi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > why not just move the dependency into the elephant-tests system > definition? > > yep we could make it more fine-grained, i think, but what is a problem with > bordeaux-threads anyway? iirc it just works via dummy functions if > threads are not supported by implementation, so it's totally safe
It's mainly just an annoyance for me, since I already had a package nicknamed :bt, which bordeaux-threads interferes with. But even ignoring that, I wouldn't want to enforce a dependency on something that isn't actually necessary. -- Elliott Slaughter "Any road followed precisely to its end leads precisely nowhere." - Frank Herbert
_______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
