I tend to agree with Alex. I don't think we need to optimize our use of source control. I know nothing about Mercurial, having used only CVS, subversion, and Darcs but I think getting 1.0 done should be our focus.
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 21:58 +0300, Alex Mizrahi wrote: > LPP> At least one revision from stable produces a non-trivial > merge in unstable. > > > what does this mean? > > LPP> If no one objects I'd do it with Mercurial and then upload > the resulting repository to Bitbucket. > > > why do you think mercurial would be free of problems? why not git? > what if next year some new uber-cool DVCS will appear -- will we have to > move to it? > > using bitbucket has its advantages, but IMHO not big enough to ditch current > darcs repos. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > elephant-devel site list > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
