Hi Ian,
it works!
This is a music to my ears:
---
(do-backend-tests)
...
Single store mode: ignoring.
Did 500 checks.
Pass: 497 (99%)
Skip: 0 ( 0%)
Fail: 3 ( 0%)
Failure Details:
--------------------------------
INDEXING-CHANGE-CLASS []:
1 evaluated to 1, which is not = to 2..
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
INDEXING-BASIC []:
(LENGTH (GET-INSTANCES-BY-VALUE 'IDX-ONE-F 'SLOT1 N)) evaluated
to 4, which is not = to 2..
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
INDEXING-BASIC []:
(LENGTH (GET-INSTANCES-BY-RANGE 'IDX-ONE-F 'SLOT1 N (+ 1 N)))
evaluated to 5, which is not = to 3..
--------------------------------
That was slime environment.
In the sbcl prompt, all 500 tests passed OK.
I`m baffled as to why this might be.
Thank you very much,
let`s try some exciting stuff with elephant.
Best regards,
mosi
2009/3/12 Ian Eslick <esl...@media.mit.edu>:
> A couple of quick points:
>
> - The latest elephant requires BDB 4.7
>
> - The C compilation step can cause problems when run from
> within slime, doing an initial compile from the console typically
> fixes this.
>
> - Sometimes SBCL complains the compile failed due to package export
> or other issues but things are fine.
>
> Do you have the trace of activity printed to the lisp repl window?
> That is more informative than the backtrace.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:00 AM, mosi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> i tried the following:
>> This is SBCL 1.0.26.1 (threading on, unicode on) on debian linux,
>> compiled from clbuild, run on SLIME 2008-12-23.
>> I followed the installation instructions from
>> http://common-lisp.net/project/elephant/doc/
>>
>> pulled the latest build:
>> darcs get http://www.common-lisp.net/project/elephant/darcs/elephant-1.0
>>
>> installed all dependencies (lots of them were already installed
>> previously by asdf-install: and clbuild), the berkeleydb 4.5 in the
>> default folders, configured the my-config.sexp
>>
>> There are some problems during the compilation of elephant:
>> memutils, serializer, serializer1, serializer2, unicode, etc. succeed
>> to compile, but throw: asdf-compile failed, and recompile does not
>> help.
>> -----------
>> erred while invoking #<COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}> on
>> #<CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}>
>> [Condition of type ASDF:COMPILE-FAILED]
>>
>> Restarts:
>> 0: [TRY-RECOMPILING] Try recompiling memutil
>> 1: [RETRY] Retry performing #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}> on
>> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}>.
>> 2: [ACCEPT] Continue, treating #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}> on
>> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}> as having been successful.
>> 3: [RETRY] Retry SLIME REPL evaluation request.
>> 4: [ABORT] Return to SLIME's top level.
>> 5: [TERMINATE-THREAD] Terminate this thread (#<THREAD "repl-thread"
>> RUNNING {B7170D1}>)
>>
>> Backtrace:
>> 0: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM (ASDF:COMPILE-OP
>> ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE)) #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable argument>
>> #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}> #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil"
>> {BC60411}>)
>> Locals:
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-0 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-1 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-2 = #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-3 = #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}>
>> 1: ((LAMBDA (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0.
>> SB-PCL::.ARG1.)) ..)
>> Locals:
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-0 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-1 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-2 = #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-3 = #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}>
>> 2: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM ASDF:AROUND (ASDF:COMPILE-OP
>> ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE)) ..)
>> Locals:
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-0 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-1 = #S(SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD-CALL ..)
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-2 = #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B62E909}>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-3 = #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "memutil" {BC60411}>
>> 3: ((LAMBDA ()))
>> 4: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK))
>> 5: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]477))
>> 6: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK ..)
>> 7: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {BB53A6D}>)
>> [:EXTERNAL]
>> 8: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:LOAD-OP :ELEPHANT)[:EXTERNAL]
>> 9: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV (ASDF:OPERATE 'ASDF:LOAD-OP
>> :ELEPHANT) #<NULL-LEXENV>)
>> 10: (SWANK::EVAL-REGION "(asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :elephant)\n")
>> 11: ((LAMBDA ()))
>> 12: (SWANK::TRACK-PACKAGE #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {AF72AE5}>)
>> 13: (SWANK::CALL-WITH-RETRY-RESTART "Retry SLIME REPL evaluation
>> request." #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {AF72A75}>)
>> 14: (SWANK::CALL-WITH-BUFFER-SYNTAX NIL #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #)
>> {AF72A5D}>)
>> 15: (SWANK::REPL-EVAL "(asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :elephant)\n")
>> 16: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV (SWANK:LISTENER-EVAL "(asdf:operate
>> 'asdf:load-op :elephant)\n") #<NULL-LEXENV>)
>> 17: (SWANK::EVAL-FOR-EMACS (SWANK:LISTENER-EVAL "(asdf:operate
>> 'asdf:load-op :elephant)\n") "COMMON-LISP-USER" 13)
>> 18: (SWANK::PROCESS-REQUESTS NIL)
>> 19: ((LAMBDA ()))
>> 20: ((LAMBDA (SWANK-BACKEND::HOOK SWANK-BACKEND::FUN)) #<FUNCTION
>> SWANK:SWANK-DEBUGGER-HOOK> #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {B85D7AD}>)
>> 21: (SWANK::CALL-WITH-REDIRECTED-IO #<SWANK::CONNECTION {B48E811}>
>> #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {B85D7BD}>)
>> 22: (SWANK::CALL-WITH-CONNECTION #<SWANK::CONNECTION {B48E811}>
>> #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {B85D7AD}>)
>> 23: (SWANK::HANDLE-REQUESTS #<SWANK::CONNECTION {B48E811}> NIL)
>> ------------
>> After accepting the compilation as successful, everything looks ok:
>>
>> ; caught WARNING:
>> ; These variables are undefined:
>> ; ELEPHANT::*NUMBER-RELATION-FUNCTIONS*
>> ; ELEPHANT::*STRING-RELATION-FUNCTIONS* ELEPHANT::FILTER-BY-
>> RELATION
>> ; ELEPHANT::FILTER-INSTANCE
>> ;
>> ; compilation unit finished
>> ; caught 49 WARNING conditions
>> ; caught 2 STYLE-WARNING conditions
>> ; printed 805 notes
>> NIL
>> -----------
>> after that, tried to test:
>> (setf *test-db-spec* '(:BDB "/tmp/db/"))
>> (open-store *test-db-spec*)
>> -----------
>> invalid number of arguments: 1
>> [Condition of type SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR]
>>
>> Restarts:
>> 0: [RETRY] Retry SLIME REPL evaluation request.
>> 1: [ABORT] Return to SLIME's top level.
>> 2: [TERMINATE-THREAD] Terminate this thread (#<THREAD "repl-thread"
>> RUNNING {B7170D1}>)
>>
>> Backtrace:
>> 0: (DB-BDB::%DB-ENV-CREATE #<unavailable argument> #<unavailable
>> argument>)[:EXTERNAL]
>> Locals:
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-0 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-1 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> SB-DEBUG::ARG-2 = :<NOT-AVAILABLE>
>> 1: (DB-BDB::DB-ENV-CREATE)
>> [No Locals]
>> 2: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ELEPHANT::OPEN-CONTROLLER
>> (DB-BDB::BDB-STORE-CONTROLLER)) #<unavailable lambda list>)[:EXTERNAL]
>> [No Locals]
>> 3: ((LAMBDA (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0.
>> SB-INT:&MORE SB-PCL::.DFUN-MORE-CONTEXT. SB-PCL::.DFUN-MORE-COUNT.))
>> ..)
>> 4: (OPEN-STORE #<unavailable lambda list>)[:EXTERNAL]
>> 5: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV (OPEN-STORE *TEST-DB-SPEC*) #<NULL-
>> LEXENV>)
>> ---------
>> and:
>> EL-TESTS> (do-backend-tests)
>> the same error.
>>
>> I tried elephant 1.0 stable, 0.9, sbcl 23 with the latest elephant,
>> but every time it gives another error, 0.9 crashes miserably,
>> resulting in a memory overload.
>>
>> What are the exact prerequisities you use on a running system?
>> Any idea what went wrong?
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>> /o>
>> |/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> elephant-devel site list
>> elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>
_______________________________________________
elephant-devel site list
elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
