This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections to the patch?
The patch seems to fix metaobject protocol issues. Does anybody object to moving Elephant over to use Closer to MOP? We could avoid this sort of bug in the future Red On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nikodemus Siivola < nikode...@random-state.net> wrote: > *cough* attached... > > Cheers, > > -- Nikodemus > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nikodemus Siivola <nikode...@random-state.net> > Date: 29 March 2011 08:33 > Subject: Elephant patch for current SBCL > To: quickl...@googlegroups.com, elephant-devel@common-lisp.net, > ablumb...@common-lisp.net, rr...@common-lisp.net, > iesl...@common-lisp.net > > > Attached a darcs diff against the 1.0 repository, which restores > buildability on recent SBCLs. > > As of 1.0.46.11, various internals changed broke Elephant. I haven't > tested the attached patch very carefully, but it builds and passes > Elephant's own tests. > > As near as I can tell the code I excised should never (well, for the > past few years at any rate) have been needed on SBCL. > > Cheers, > > -- Nikodemus > > _______________________________________________ > elephant-devel site list > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel >
_______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
