> I didn't do that, because I wanted the normal circularity check to catch > that. If we get a failure because of any circular reference, > self-reference or not, it is probably is something we need to > investigate. I cannot imagine when anything like that isn't some bug in > the producer.
Well, that's what dwarflint is for. There is nothing algorithmically difficult about handling direct self-reference in the hash function. It exists in some data, whether by producer bug or not, so we have to handle it. The kludge is just too ugly. > It this case it was > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=elfutils.git;a=commit;h=17a29217e9145989ca15479132f8d6d8f80f0258 Ok, I see the method now. What is calling that? Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
